Research and Learning

1985–2018

Strickland’s CPA: Pulse Energy, Duration and Peak Power

Learn chirped pulse amplification through Strickland and Mourou’s corrected 1985 record, a worked pulse-energy example and clear distinctions between power and intensity.

Original documentary or teaching figure for Strickland’s CPA: Pulse Energy, Duration and Peak Power. Ideal loss-free rectangular-pulse arithmetic only. Values are not historical results, real apparatus settings or a clinical claim. Real pulse shape and spatial distributions require further information.
1985
Research publication
2 ps
Reported pulse width in the inspected abstract
200 MW
Final fictional rectangular-pulse value

The short answer

Stretching, amplification and compression change different properties of an optical pulse. Keeping the energy ledger separate from duration helps explain the method and exposes common errors in descriptions of it.

Read the evidence

Keep the evidence attached to its claim

The same observation can answer some questions while leaving others open.

Source interpretation and independent teaching analysis.
Record or taskWhat it supportsWhat remains open
Stretch 1 µJ,10 fs→1 ps100 MW→1 MW under the stated assumptionsA measured loss or actual laser configuration
Amplify 1→2 µJ at 1 ps1 MW→2 MW; added energyEnergy created by compression
Compress 2 µJ,1 ps→10 fs2 MW→200 MW with ideal loss-free compressionIntensity without a spatial model

Chronology

A timeline of the turning points

  1. Research and correction

    The inspected December copy records the earlier figure error.

  2. Nobel recognition

    Strickland and Mourou were recognised for the method.

  3. Forty-year retrospective

    Rochester and Waterloo discussed later development.

Identify the publication version

The inspected copy is the corrected December 1985 paper by Donna Strickland and Gérard Mourou, published in Optics Communications 56,pp 219–221. Its first-page note identifies an earlier volume 55 version with an incorrectly printedFigure 1. Both records concern the same research; they are not two separate inventions.

The abstract reports millijoule-level energy and a 2 ps pulse width. That demonstrated result should stay separate from the paper’s discussion of more ambitious possible performance. Only the first page of this supplied copy was visually inspected.

Sources for this section: [1]

Three stages with different jobs

The method stretches a pulse before amplification and compresses it afterward. At a given energy, distributing the pulse over a longer time lowers its peak power. Amplification adds energy; compression can then concentrate it in time.

Rochester’s retrospective connects this approach to later high-power laser development. Later applications involve further engineering and different systems, rather than every modern result being a direct measurement from the 1985 experiment.

Sources for this section: [2] · [3]

A worked fictional energy ledger

Assume ideal rectangular pulses, no energy loss in stretching or compression and no change in illuminated area. Start with 1 µJ over 10 fs: dividing energy by duration gives 100 MW. Stretch it to 1 ps with the same energy and the value becomes 1 MW.

Now add energy in the amplifier, reaching 2 µJ over 1 ps: the value is 2 MW. Compress to 10 fs without losing energy and it becomes 200 MW. The amplifier doubled the energy. Compression changed how quickly that energy was delivered. These assumed values are an invented arithmetic exercise, not apparatus settings or historical results.

Sources for this section: [1]

Power is not the same quantity as intensity

Question: did loss-free compression create more energy, and do the numbers determine an intensity inW/cm²?

Answer: compression preserved the assumed 2 µJ. It increased power by reducing duration. Intensity also requires the spatial distribution and area, which this example does not supply. For nonrectangular real pulses, energy divided by a quoted duration is not automatically the exact peak power; pulse shape and the definition of duration matter. The exercise isolates the bookkeeping rather than specifying a laser design.

Sources for this section: [1] · [2]

Continue the chronology

Biography context

Explore Canada and United States through connected lives

Connected biographies

Researchers and their work

CanadaCulture

1959–

Donna Strickland

Optical physicistDonna Strickland developed chirped pulse amplification as a doctoral researcher, then pursued ultrafast optics through laboratories in Canada and the United States.Read biography

Quick answers

Common questions

Does compression itself add pulse energy?
In the ideal loss-free example it preserves energy while changing duration.
Why identify the corrected paper?
Its first-page note explicitly reports an earlier Figure 1 printing error.

Primary and institutional sources

How this history was checked

Compare the inspected records with the question, calculation and stated limits below. This article was reviewed on 29 October 2026.

  1. Donna Strickland and Gérard Mourou; Optics CommunicationsCorrected 1985 paper, first page inspected
  2. University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser EnergeticsCPA at 40: laboratory retrospective
  3. University of Waterloo NewsForty-year retrospective,1 December 2025