Culture and primary records

1804–2017

in Pursuit of Venus: From Wallpaper to Video

Compare Lisa Reihana’s source wallpaper, 2015 interview and 2017 Venice installation record to see what changes in a moving panorama.

Original editorial diagram separating source, response and format.

The short answer

Lisa Reihana’s project has a source image, an artistic response and specific installations. Compare all three before assigning a date, length or viewing experience to the work.

Reading the evidence

What each record establishes

Keep the subject of each record and the conclusion it can support in separate columns.

Original comparison using the article’s sources.
RecordIdentifiesKeep separate
WallpaperA scenic print source for the later project.The event it imagines or the artist’s response.
2015 interviewMaker’s account and one presentation caption.A specification for every edition.
Venice and catalogueTwo differently described viewing formats.Undocumented production or conversion steps.

Identify the image being answered

Te Papa identifies an early nineteenth-century wallpaper associated with Jean-Gabriel Charvet and Joseph Dufour. Its panels brought an imagined Pacific scene to interiors far from the places depicted. A viewer could move along the wall, but the figures remained fixed and the scene carried the assumptions of its producers.

Reihana’s interview explains why that source interested her and why a panoramic video setting offered a way to answer it. What mattered was not just bringing a still image to life. The work could repopulate the landscape with performers and change the point from which a viewer experiences the encounters.

Sources for this section: [2] · [1]

Match the technology to the record

The caption accompanying QAGOMA’s 2015 interview names a four-channel, 32-minute presentation. Te Papa describes the Venice project as a five-channel work. The QAGOMA collection record now lists a single-channel, 64-minute format. These are specifications attached to separate records; a reader should not combine them into one technical description.

Make a row for each source and note whether it describes an interview-era presentation, a specific exhibition or a collection format. The rows can document differences without assuming exactly when or how one configuration was converted into another.

Sources for this section: [1] · [2] · [3]

Try a label for a viewer

Write a caption for the historical wallpaper and another for one specified video presentation. In the second, name what a viewer can experience through movement, performance or sound. Then ask what would disappear if only a still image were reproduced. That last question helps explain why the display record matters.

Sources for this section: [2] · [1]

Continue the chronology

Biography context

Explore New Zealand through connected lives

Connected biographies

Explore the people behind the records

Lisa Reihana, right, with Dame Cindy Kiro following the 2022 investiture.
New ZealandCulture

b. 1964

Lisa Reihana

Multimedia artistA Māori artist whose time-based works reconsider the settings and voices through which Pacific histories are represented.Read biography

Quick answers

Common questions

Why do the sources give different channel counts?
They describe different records or presentation formats. Keep the number attached to the particular record that supplies it.

Primary and institutional sources

How this history was checked

Selected first-person, exhibition and collection records support the factual claims. The reading exercise and comparison are editorial interpretations. This article was reviewed on 5 November 2026.

  1. Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Artin Pursuit of Venus [infected]: An Interview with Lisa Reihana
  2. Museum of New Zealand Te Papa TongarewaIntroducing Lisa Reihana: Emissaries
  3. Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Artin Pursuit of Venus [infected], 2015–17