Art and the evidence

2010s and 2020 interview

Lubugo: When the Support Shapes the Painting

Compare Armitage’s account of choosing Ugandan bark cloth with museum observations of its holes and texture to understand how a support enters composition.

Original explanatory study diagram for Lubugo: When the Support Shapes the Painting.

The short answer

How does a bark-cloth support affect the surface of a painting?

Compare the records

What the sources allow us to say

Read the object record alongside the contextual account.

Original source comparison and reading questions.
RecordEvidenceReading limit
Artist and museum accountLubugo bark cloth provides an irregular painting support.Its joins and openings are material properties, not painted marks.
Institutional interpretationRelates support and imagery within particular paintings.A material’s history does not determine one meaning for every work.

A support can arrive with a history

Armitage describes seeking a material that would locate his paintings in East Africa from the beginning of the process. Lubugo is made from fig-tree bark in Uganda and has ceremonial associations. Its selection therefore changes the cultural starting point of a painting. The choice does not supply a complete interpretation of the finished image, but it prevents the support from being treated as an interchangeable blank surface whose identity matters only after the pigments have been applied.

Sources for this section: [2]

Irregularity becomes a compositional condition

Glenstone notes perforations and punctures integrated into Armitage’s paintings. These are physical features that an artist must negotiate when placing a figure or organising a field of colour. The relationship can be reciprocal. A planned image meets the available surface, and the surface can suggest a different arrangement. The biographical account’s discussion of his figurative work gives this material process a context, showing why the image’s East African concerns are carried through both subject matter and support.

Sources for this section: [1] · [3]

A practical comparison without reproducing the work

Draw two neutral rectangles, one empty and one interrupted by a small gap. Place a simple line through each and explain how the gap changes its course or emphasis. A useful answer demonstrates the compositional effect of an interruption while acknowledging that it does not reconstruct Armitage’s technique. Connect the result with the documented perforations. The exercise clarifies a material relationship, while precise claims about preparing, repairing or priming an original work would require its conservation and making records beyond the observations used here.

Sources for this section: [2] · [3]

Continue the chronology

Biography context

Explore Kenya through connected lives

Connected biographies

Read the artist’s biography

KenyaCulture

b. 1984

Michael Armitage

PainterA Kenyan British painter whose East African subjects and bark-cloth supports reshape the terms of figurative painting.Read biography

Quick answers

Common questions

Is lubugo simply another name for ordinary canvas?
No. The sources identify a Ugandan bark cloth made from a fig tree, with its own material and cultural history.

Primary and institutional sources

How this history was checked

The listed records support the facts. Observation exercises and arguments are Biography Compass editorial interpretations. This article was reviewed on 7 November 2026.

  1. Ben Uri Research UnitMichael Armitage
  2. MoMA,artist interviewBark Cloth
  3. GlenstoneMichael Armitage