Astronomy history

1847–1848

The 1847 Comet: Observation, Notice and Credit

Read the records of Maria Mitchell’s 1847 comet and use an original correspondence exercise to separate the sighting, announcement and prize decision.

Original chronology diagram separating a comet sighting, the transmission of a notice and a later award decision.

The short answer

An astronomical discovery can carry several dates. A claim about when a comet was observed should not be dated by when the news reached another observer.

Reading the evidence

Three dates in a discovery record

The labels matter as much as the date values.

Original comparison using the records identified in the article.
StageDated eventQuestion it answers
ObservationTime and position are recorded.When and where was it seen?
NoticeA report is sent, received or printed.When could others check it?
AwardAn institution recognises a claim.What decision was made under its rules?

Chronology

A timeline of the turning points

  1. Mitchell’s observation

    Mitchell records a telescopic comet at Nantucket.

  2. Publication

    A notice recording her earlier observation appears in Astronomische Nachrichten.

Begin with an observing log

The report reproduced in the Mitchell family edition records Mitchell’s sighting on 1 October 1847, and a sighting by Francesco de Vico in Rome on 3 October. Each is an observing event. If two people claim the same object, an editor needs enough detail to decide whether they saw the same comet before comparing which observation was earlier.

The position relative to familiar stars and the recorded time give a later reader something to check. The editor’s account of the evening is a different record from the contemporary notice and correspondence included in the appendix.

Sources for this section: [1] · [2]

Follow the notices and prize rules

Information passed from the Mitchells to the Bonds and was sent on for publication. The notice in Astronomische Nachrichten appeared in December. The prize rules printed alongside the letters placed emphasis on quick communication and required information about the time and position. The rules therefore add a question beyond who looked first. Did the news travel in a form the award process could act on?

The eventual medal is evidence of recognition. It is neither the first observation nor the day the observation entered print. Place it in a separate column.

Sources for this section: [1]

Order two invented messages

Suppose observer A records a new object on Monday and a notice arrives Friday. Observer B records the object on Tuesday and a notice arrives Wednesday. A made the earlier observation; B’s notice arrived first. Before awarding a prize, read what its rules actually require. Record which parts of the judgment could change if the observations described different objects or if one of the dates was uncertain.

Continue the chronology

Biography context

Explore United States through connected lives

Connected biographies

People in the records

Maria Mitchell, seated, with another woman beside a telescope at Vassar College.
United StatesCulture

1818–1889

Maria Mitchell

Astronomer, teacher and Vassar observatory directorMitchell observed comets from Nantucket and later used Vassar’s observatory as a place for students to conduct research.Read biography

Quick answers

Common questions

Does first publication always establish the earliest observation?
No. Letters and notices can travel at different speeds. Compare the dated observing evidence separately.

Primary and institutional sources

How this history was checked

Dates, legal milestones and historical claims are checked against the official and institutional records below. This article was reviewed on 5 November 2026.

  1. Edited by Phebe Mitchell Kendall, Project GutenbergLife, Letters, and Journals: chapter III and appendix
  2. Smithsonian Institution ArchivesMaria Mitchell and the Smithsonian